Bush vs gore why the votes

As to Miami-Dade County, the court concluded that although the votes identified were the result of a partial recount, they were "legal votes [that] could change the outcome of the election.

And there is no basis for reading the Florida statutes as requiring the counting of improperly marked ballots, as an examination of the Florida Supreme Court's textual analysis shows. Of particular relevance [17] to this case was the so-called " safe harbor " provision, which allows states to appoint their electors without Congressional interference if done by a specified deadline: On November 8,the day following the Presidential election, the Florida Division of Elections reported that petitioner, Governor Bush, had received 2, votes, and respondent, Vice President Gore, had received 2, votes, a margin of 1, for Governor Bush.

Yet the official tallies showed Bush Jr. The record, as weighed by the Florida Supreme Court, suggested that different standards were seemingly applied to the recount from ballot to ballot, precinct to precinct, and county to county, even when identical types of ballots and machines were used.

Nazism reached its end in a Berlin turned into a battleground of unparalleled violence, fire and brutality as the Soviet forces dealt blows of destruc-tion and revenge. Verified counts are impossible because the machines leave no reliable paper trail. Bush amounted to another stolen election.

The recount process, in its features here described, is inconsistent with the minimum procedures necessary to protect the fundamental right of each voter in the special instance of a statewide recount under the authority of a single state judicial officer.

In the 's, Francis Galton a cousin of Charles Darwin took this Malthusian theory see above a step further: The Florida Supreme Court, 4 It is inconceivable that what constitutes a vote that must be counted under the "error in the vote tabulation" language of the protest phase is different from what constitutes a vote that must be counted under the "legal votes" language of the contest phase.

Voter Outreach of America, a company funded by the Republican National Committee, collected thousands of voter registration forms in Nevada, promising to turn them in to public officials, but then systematically destroyed the ones belonging to Democrats. Florida statutory law cannot reasonably be thought to require the counting of im- 2We vacated that decision and remanded that case; the Florida Supreme Court reissued the same judgment with a new opinion on December 11,Palm Beach County Canvassing Bd.

In so doing, it relied on the sufficiency of the general "intent of the voter" standard articulated by the state legislature, coupled with a procedure for ultimate review by an impartial judge, to resolve the concern about disparate evaluations of contested ballots.

It certainly would appear unnecessary that our soldiers and sailors and merchant marines must make a special effort to retain the right to vote. The recount mechanisms implemented in response to the decisions of the Florida Supreme Court do not satisfy the minimum requirement for non-arbitrary treatment of voters necessary to secure the fundamental right.

Only someone who rejoices in the worst excesses of man's inhumanity to man could support or connect themselves with such an organisation.

Votes, Not Outrage, Will Give Democrats Their November 'Blue Wave'

This was cheating, and a violation of the judicial oath. Issues considered by the Court[ edit ] The Court had to resolve two different questions to fully resolve the case: Inas a result of a New York Times article, an Ad Hoc Advisory panel reviewed the study and found that the Tuskegee Study was "ethically unjustified".

The Court found a constitutional violation. Were the recounts, as they were being conducted, constitutional? Similar abuses and mistreatment of voters and votes occurred in other parts of the country.

The court therefore ordered a hand recount of the 9, ballots in Miami-Dade County. By prayer to any source of good in which one believes, one can receive comfort and fortitude; by participating in Satanic rites, however sham, one can make oneself a focus for evil.

The contest provision, as it was mandated by the State Supreme Court, is not well calculated to sustain the confidence that all citizens must have in the outcome of elections. Because it is evident that any recount seeking to meet the December 12 date will be unconstitutional for the reasons we have discussed, we reverse the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida ordering a recount to proceed.

Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000)

It is the Nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law. McCain would eventually become the Republican presidential nominee 8 years laterwhich he then lost to Barack Obama.

With respect to the equal protection question, we find a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.

So, who really won? What the Bush v. Gore studies showed

That brings the analysis to yet a further equal protection problem. Insignia of Hitler's SA in Rauschning also reports in 'Hitler Speaks' a warning given to Hitler by a percipient woman in his circle, one of the few who dared to speak forthrightly to him.

Equal protection applies as well to the manner of its exercise. Gore did remand the case instead of dismissing it, but the remand did not include another request for clarification.

When contending parties invoke the process of the courts, however, it becomes our unsought responsibility to resolve the federal and constitutional issues the judicial system has been forced to confront. In these, a 'talent scout' picks up a likely victim at an ordinary spiritualistic seance and says to him, 'This is only nursery stuff.

A Supremely Bad Decision: The Majority Ruling in Bush v. Gore

It would seem that US leadership was indeed essential! Fewer than votes separated the candidates, and that margin appeared to be narrowing.Perhaps no event better illustrates the power of the United States Supreme Court than the resolution of the presidential election.

Just when you thought the separation of powers issue had been settled once and for all, the Court stepped in to adjudicate who had won the biggest political contest of all.

Watch "California wildfire death toll reaches 86 people with hundreds still missing as heavy rains and mudslides threaten rescue efforts", a CBSN video on kaleiseminari.com View more CBSN videos and.

In the election between Republican candidate George W. Bush and Democrat candidate Al Gore, Florida reported that Bush had won the state by 1, votes.

In one of the closest contests in U.S. history, the presidential election between Democratic Vice-President Al Gore and Republican governor of Texas George W. Bush (hereafter referred to as Bush Jr. to distinguish him from his father who was also a president), the final outcome hinged on how the vote went in kaleiseminari.comndent investigations in that state revealed serious irregularities.

The United States presidential election of was the 54th quadrennial presidential kaleiseminari.com was held on Tuesday, November 7, Republican candidate George W. Bush, the Governor of Texas and the eldest son of the 41st President George H. W. Bush, won the election by defeating Democratic nominee Al Gore, the incumbent vice kaleiseminari.com was the fourth of five presidential elections in.

Dec 19,  · George W. Bush vs. Al Gore, 15 years later: We really did inaugurate the wrong guy Although statistics showed that the butterfly ballot deprived Gore of enough votes to cost him the election.

Bush vs gore why the votes
Rated 5/5 based on 92 review